中国特色社会主义研究 ›› 2025, Issue (3): 55-68.

• 中国式现代化理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

公民数字素养的核心要素与法治建构

苏明月, 赵阳   

  • 收稿日期:2025-01-15 出版日期:2025-06-28 发布日期:2025-07-23
  • 作者简介:苏明月,北京师范大学法学院副教授|赵阳,西南科技大学法学院特聘副教授

Core Elements of Civic Digital Literacy and Its Construction of the Rule of Law

Su Mingyue, Zhao Yang   

  • Received:2025-01-15 Online:2025-06-28 Published:2025-07-23

摘要:

随着技术规训逐渐成为数字时代社会治理的重要范式,公民在算法主导的数据结构中面临权利失衡与能力缺失的双重挑战。公民数字素养不仅是一种基础能力,更是维护数字时代权利主体性的重要保障。首先,以“能力—权利—法治”的逻辑框架,提出由数字认知、技能、安全意识与伦理法律意识构成的四层能力金字塔模型,并指出能力维度缺失将导致权利虚化与数字失能。其次,进一步构建了涵盖权利规范、行为边界与责任分配三元结构的制度回应体系,强调通过算法治理立法、数据权利保护、伦理责任共担等方式,落实技术赋权与法治护航的双重路径。在比较法视野下,分析了欧盟GDPR、美国COPPA及日本多层次治理体系的经验,指出中国特色数字素养治理需实现“技术—伦理—制度”三者的协同共治。最后,在制度上实现数字能力与权利的同步强化,构建系统性、公平性与可解释性兼具的法治化保障机制,实现技术向善与公民赋权的共赢局面。

关键词: 数字素养, 算法治理, 核心素养, 权利保障, 伦理法治

Abstract:

As technological disciplinary power increasingly becomes a dominant paradigm of social governance in the digital age, citizens face dual challenges of power imbalance and capability deficiency within algorithm-driven data structures. Digital literacy is not only a fundamental competence but also a crucial safeguard for maintaining subjectivity and rights in the digital era. This paper, based on a “capability-rights-rule of law” framework, proposes a four-tiered capability pyramid model comprising digital cognition, skills, security awareness, and ethical-legal consciousness. The paper argues that deficiencies in any of these dimensions lead to the hollowing out of rights and digital disempowerment. A tripartite institutional response system is constructed, consisting of normative rights protection, behavioral boundaries, and responsibility allocation. The authors emphasize the dual paths of algorithm governance legislation and rights protection through data governance, alongside shared ethical responsibility. Through comparative analysis, the paper draws upon the experiences of the EU’s GDPR, the U.S. COPPA, and Japan’s multi-level governance models, concluding that China's digital literacy governance should strive for a synergistic approach integrating technology, ethics, and institutional design. The study concludes that only through simultaneous institutional enhancement of both digital capabilities and rights, and by building a legal protection mechanism that is systematic, equitable, and interpretable, can the goal of “technology for good” and citizen empowerment be achieved.

Key words: digital literacy, algorithmic governance, core competencies, rights protection, ethics-based rule of law

中图分类号: