中国特色社会主义研究 ›› 2025, Issue (3): 95-106.

• 中国式现代化理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

数智社会算法治理的法律规范研究—— 基于发展与治理平衡视角

沈颖尹   

  • 收稿日期:2025-05-20 出版日期:2025-06-28 发布日期:2025-07-23
  • 作者简介:沈颖尹,苏州大学马克思主义学院讲师,江苏省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心苏州大学基地研究员
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“网络时代的社会治理与刑法体系的理论创新”(20&ZD199)

Legal Regulation of Algorithmic Governance in the Digital-Intelligent Society: From the Perspective of Balancing Development and Governance

Shen Yingyin   

  • Received:2025-05-20 Online:2025-06-28 Published:2025-07-23

摘要:

数智社会新形态下,算法治理引发了数字技术代理人类实施治理的范式变革,促使算法从中立的数据运算工具,成为制度秩序重构的主导力量,对传统法律体系带来了前所未有的挑战。立足发展与治理平衡视角,结合中国法治语境,提出坚持价值引领、制度弹性与动态适配相统一的规范路径,融合软法机制与场景响应体系,探索适应本土实践的算法治理法律规范方案。通过构建以技术向善、算法治理安全为导向的法律规范体系,回应算法规训、算法歧视、算法黑箱等所引发的风险问题,推动法律在保障个体权利与社会秩序方面的实质作用。同时,坚持法律介入的正当性与谦抑性原则,警惕对算法治理的过度干预,在鼓励技术创新与维护公共秩序之间寻求动态平衡,探索善治之道。

关键词: 算法治理, 法律规范, 发展与治理平衡, 比例原则

Abstract:

In the context of the emerging intelligent digital society, algorithmic governance has triggered a paradigmatic shift whereby digital technologies increasingly act as agents of governance, transforming algorithms from neutral data processing tools into dominant forces reshaping institutional order. This evolution poses unprecedented challenges to traditional legal systems. Anchored in the dual perspective of “development and governance” and grounded in China’s legal context, this paper proposes a regulatory path that upholds value orientation,institutional flexibility,and dynamic adaptability. It advocates a localized normative framework integrating soft law mechanisms with scenario-responsive systems to accommodate practical realities. By constructing a legal normative system oriented toward technological beneficence and safe algorithmic governance, the study aims to address risks such as algorithmic disciplining,bias, and opacity,thereby enhancing the substantive role of law in safeguarding individual rights and maintaining social order. At the same time, it emphasizes the legitimacy and modesty of legal intervention, cautioning against regulatory overreach,and seeks a dynamic balance between encouraging technological innovation and preserving public order—ultimately advancing the pursuit of good governance.

Key words: algorithmic governance, legal regulation, development-governance balance, proportionality principle

中图分类号: