中国特色社会主义研究 ›› 2025, Issue (6): 53-69.

• 中国式现代化理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

“内卷式”竞争的不同表现、生成机理与破解路径——基于马克思主义政治经济学的分析

杨明萱, 眭纪刚   

  • 收稿日期:2025-10-26 出版日期:2025-12-28 发布日期:2026-01-28
  • 作者简介:杨明萱,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院博士研究生|眭纪刚,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院研究员、中国科学院大学教授
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“新一轮全球科技革命和产业变革趋势及对我国影响研究”(24&ZD051)

The Different Manifestations, Formation Mechanisms, and Resolution Paths of "Involutionary" Competition: An Analysis Based on Marxist Political Economy

Yang Mingxuan, Sui Jigang   

  • Received:2025-10-26 Online:2025-12-28 Published:2026-01-28

摘要:

“内卷式”竞争的特征是低价低质,并往往伴随着低利润率和产能过剩。这与党的二十届四中全会提出的“高质量发展取得显著成效、科技自立自强水平大幅提高”目标存在根本冲突。从马克思主义政治经济学的视角出发,“内卷式”竞争体现了积累的结构性矛盾即价值生产和价值实现的矛盾。一方面,资本流动性加强和去技能化进程加快降低了行业准入门槛,加剧了部门内竞争和部门间竞争;另一方面,在技术进步带来单位商品价值量下降的过程中,需求规模增长和工艺创新进入边际递减阶段,形成产出—积累瓶颈。破解内卷式竞争,需要供需双边发力的同时优化制度供给。供给层面,通过产品创新和新部门创生,缓解工艺创新趋于极限所带来的同类型产品价格竞争;制度层面,畅通经济循环、建立全国统一大市场的同时积极扩展国际市场,是对冲内卷化竞争的必经途径;需求层面,以供需协同培育新的消费增长点和可持续的消费动能,实现 “以新需求引领新供给,以新供给创造新需求”。

关键词: 内卷式竞争, 资本积累, 产品创新, 工艺创新

Abstract:

"Involutionary" competition is characterized by low prices and low quality, often accompanied by low profit margins and overcapacity. This is fundamentally incompatible with the goals proposed at the 4th Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, namely "achieving remarkable results in high-quality development and significantly enhancing the level of self-reliance and self-improvement in science and technology". From the perspective of Marxist political economy, "involutionary" competition reflects the structural contradiction of capital accumulation, i.e., the contradiction between value production and value realization. On one hand, increased capital mobility and the accelerated process of deskilling have lowered industry entry barriers, intensifying both intra-sectoral and inter-sectoral competition. On the other hand, amid technological progress—which reduces the value of per unit commodity—the growth of demand scale and process innovation have entered a stage of marginal decline, creating an output-accumulation bottleneck. To break the involutional competition, efforts on both the supply and demand sides are required while optimizing institutional supply. On the supply side, alleviating the price competition of homogeneous products caused by the approaching limit of process innovation requires product innovation and the creation of new sectors. Institutionally, hedging against involutionary competition necessarily involves smoothing economic circulation, establishing a unified national market, and actively expanding the international market. On the demand side, we should foster new consumption growth drivers and sustainable consumption momentum through supply-demand coordination, and realize the goal of "guiding new supply with new demand and creating new demand with new supply."

Key words: involutionary competition, capital accumulation, product innovation, process innovation

中图分类号: