中国特色社会主义研究 ›› 2025, Issue (4): 95-106.

• 中国式现代化理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

“生态破坏”的名与实:从资源逻辑到系统保护的法典回应

黄锡生, 冯春阳   

  • 收稿日期:2025-07-12 出版日期:2025-08-28 发布日期:2025-09-19
  • 作者简介:黄锡生,重庆大学法学院教授|冯春阳,重庆大学法学院博士研究生
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“生态文明视野下自然资源资产产权法律制度研究”(21ZDA091);2024年度中央高校基本科研业务费项目“生命共同体理念下自然资源一体化治理研究(第二阶段)”的阶段性研究成果(2024CDJSKPT06)

The Name and Reality of "Ecological Destruction": The Codified Response from Resource Logic to Systemic Protection

Huang Xisheng, Feng Chunyang   

  • Received:2025-07-12 Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-09-19

摘要:

“生态破坏”概念界定是生态环境法典编纂的核心基础工作。现行立法未予明确界定,司法实践长期依赖学理解释,致使该概念在适用过程中呈现客体识别混乱、行为意图模糊、类型划分失序等困境。在污染控制编与生态保护编并列结构下,“生态破坏”应作为生态保护的基本规制对象体现类型独立与制度统摄。应从“生态系统结构与功能”与“非污染性破坏行为”两重维度建构其规范定义:“在生产和生活中,直接或间接以非排污方式改变、削弱、扰乱生态系统结构与功能,由此造成或可能造成有害影响,其性质足以破坏生态平衡、危及生态安全、危害生态环境”。并据此提出释义条款统一术语、条文修正厘清适用、责任转致完善衔接的法典植入路径。

关键词: 生态环境法典, 生态保护编, 生态破坏, 环境污染, 法律概念

Abstract:

The conceptual definition of "ecological destruction" constitutes a fundamental theoretical premise in the codification of the Ecological Environment Code. Due to the absence of a clear definition in current legislation, judicial practice has long relied on doctrinal interpretation, resulting in difficulties such as ambiguity in identifying the regulatory object, confusion regarding behavioral intent, and disorder in typological classification during application. Under the dual-structure framework of the "Pollution Control Part" and the "Ecological Protection Part," "ecological destruction" should function as the primary regulatory object of ecological protection, reflecting both typological independence and normative coherence. Its normative definition should be constructed along two dimensions: the "structure and function of ecosystems" and "non-pollution-based destructive behavior," specifically defined as:"In the course of production and daily life, directly or indirectly altering, impairing, or disrupting the structure and function of ecosystems through non-pollution means, thereby causing or potentially causing harmful impacts, of a nature sufficient to undermine ecological balance, endanger ecological security, or damage the ecological environment."On this basis, this paper proposes a codification strategy involving: a definition clause to unify terminology, textual revision to clarify application boundaries, and the refinement of responsibility provisions to ensure doctrinal consistency.

Key words: Ecological Environment Code, ecological protection part, ecological destruction, environmental pollution, legal concept

中图分类号: